🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.