🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's national security strategy offers a misguided view of the European Union. The document asserts that open-border policies and what it terms "progressive" policies represent an grave threat to the continent's identity. Yet, this argument rests on a fundamental misreading of the reality. The true challenge confronting Europe is not societal but technological and economic lag.

The Stark Growth Divide Separating the US and Europe

The data paint a sobering contrast. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP surged by eighty-seven percent, while a mere thirteen and a half percent growth for the European Union. Over this time, EU GDP per capita dropped from over three-quarters to just 50% of the US level. Strikingly, even Mississippi now boasts a greater average income than several leading EU nations like Italy and France.

Today, about 50% of the world’s top fifty technology firms are US-based, while a mere four are from Europe.

The Innovation Shortfall: The Core Question

This widening disparity is driven by superior productivity growth in the US, fueled by breakthroughs and better use of resources. The landscape of world technology dominance is decidedly American. In the last five decades, hundreds of American startups have grown into companies valued at over $10bn, versus just 14 in the European continent.

This disparity prompts a vital question: In the race for future industries like AI, semiconductors, and fusion energy, what is Europe stand? Most analysts concede it is largely a two-horse race involving the United States and China, with European nations entering at a significant handicap.

Underlying Factors of Europe's Innovation Gap

Several key reasons explain this technological divide.

• Financing Ecosystem: The United States has a much more robust and more dynamic network for funding startups. The EU still lacks a genuine capital markets union, which caps the scale of emerging companies.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Excessive and fragmented regulation hamper European business. A US startup can launch a service under a single set of laws to access a market of hundreds of millions. The European Union, despite a bigger population size, is split among 27 different national systems, creating significant market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Attitudes toward risk-taking vary greatly. In parts of Europe, a startup's collapse was historically viewed with penalties, whereas in the US, it is often considered a valuable lesson.
• Defense Spending: The United States enjoys a tightly woven innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. The continent's chronic underinvestment in military capabilities has eroded its capacity for pioneering research.

A Path Forward: Grounds for Cautious Optimism

Despite these challenges, there are reasons for hope. Policymakers are growing more conscious of the existential challenge and have started to propose substantial change. Key reports on EU competitiveness and the internal market point to the need for major changes.

With the right policies and regulatory reforms, Europe's strengths might enable much higher levels of business-led breakthroughs.

The continent retains considerable strengths: high-quality human capital, excellent education systems, and premier research institutions. Alongside a large internal market and substantial household savings, these foundations have the potential to unleash a surge of venture creation.

Importantly, even if the EU does not become the leader in creating cutting-edge technologies, it can still significantly increase productivity by adopting and adapting innovations from other regions.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now faces a critical moment. To paraphrase a famous line, decline often happens "gradually and then suddenly". To date, the continent's technological decline has been gradual. However, without decisive action to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could turn into a rapid and permanent loss of global economic relevance.